A reach if there ever was one, that is; doing a play of words on Que Sera, Sera which would have been most relevant like 500 years ago. Look man, I’m getting old but not that old. I did consider a play on The Witcher since maybe I could have threaded the needle on a Henry Cavill strategy (toss a coin to your Civale?), but it never came to fruition. Which is really gross when you think about that sentence and what exactly fruition means and how it came, but I’ll leave that to better men (and women) than myself. And if you don’t know what any of this means, I don’t either, so at least misery loves company… and since the wheels have already fallen off, something that usually doesn’t happen until at least the second paragraph of our weekly get togethers, let’s just get down to talking about Aaron Civale and his wonderful yet “measured” start and whether or not this is sustainable. And yeah, just to come full circle, I am most definitely not the man who knew too much. (Just show this to your parents, they’ll get it. They’ll have questions, but they’ll get it.)
I normally don’t cover pitchers, and it’s not that I don’t enjoy pitchers, I actually dabbled horribly in high school and college, but covering a player once-a-week, bandwidth just seems to be filled more with trending hitters and analyzing that half of fantasy baseball. Don’t hate the playa, hate the game man. But in terms of fitting themes and trends that synergize (corporate jargon achievement unlocked!), I think Civale kinda begs some attention and I need some more pitchers for the imaginary quota I just proclaimed.
Please, blog, may I have some more?
