I’ll be honest, I don’t like the term sophomore slump. As with most “catch-all” phrases, there are times where use can be misleading, likely because the definition is ambiguous. We know it occurs in the second year of a player’s career, characterized by noticeable decline after success, but that’s pretty much it. Does it matter how long the player was in the league during the preceding year? What if the player began to slightly decline in his “freshman” season and it carried over into the subsequent year? How about a scenario during a player’s second season where the consensus is the lack of production is luck based? Is that technically a sophomore slump or simply poor luck?

Struggles come after success because pitchers are smart; they adjust to their opposition with exceptional haste. The never-ending game of chess – aka, baseball – requires constant adjustment and by using the phrase “sophomore slump”, we omit the complexity of this adjustment for a simpler, verbal shrug of one’s shoulders.

Cody Bellinger warrants that shrug. But while some may cite the sophomore slump, the immensely more valuable alternative is to venture under the hood.

Let’s start with how Bellinger is being pitched…

FF = Four-seam fastball; FT = Two-seam fastball. Data via Baseball Savant.

A clear shift has occurred in how left-handers are pitching Bellinger: less fastballs, more breaking balls. It’s a natural flip, given Bellinger’s ability to square up fastballs last season and the want for most pitchers to keep balls away from the big lefty.

Part of Bellinger’s success in 2017 came from his ability to hit left-handed pitching, something few lefties with max-effort, lofting swings are able to do with any success (especially for 132 games). While Bellinger was still stronger versus right-handed pitching last year, his wRC+ between each handedness was virtually even, and he was actually striking out more versus righties.

Fast-forward to 2018 and Bellinger has been sitting versus left-handed pitching – and right-handed pitching for that matter – but his underlying skillset suggests left-handed pitching might not be the entire issue. Evidence for this point comes from his increase in patience this season against breaking balls and slight drop in whiffs versus left-handed pitching. It’s an encouraging sign even if Dave Roberts doesn’t have the confidence to start him all the time versus lefties.

Flipping sides, right-handed pitchers haven’t shifted dramatically versus the Rookie of the Year winner, with slight changes from sliders to more changeups and curveballs, uneventful given the aggregate results off Bellinger’s bat have been equally as poor.

The natural progression after analyzing usage of pitches is the location of said pitches. This unearths the widening of a hole in Bellinger’s swing.

Cody Bellinger swing and miss on four-seam fastballs (RHP & LHP). Data via Baseball Savant.

Perhaps better visualized using this graph from BrooksBaseball, the above shows the more precise shift in Bellinger’s hole and its growth. Even though in the aggregate Bellinger is seeing less fastballs, the fastballs he is seeing, from either handedness of pitcher, he is missing.

Is this a common issue? Absolutely. Numerous power hitters have holes in the upper-third of the strike zone. 2017 Aaron Judge was one of them. He has done a fabulous job of closing off this hole in 2018. Given the four-year age difference between Judge and Bellinger, I can’t say I’m surprised Judge has adjusted quicker than his West Coast counterpart has this season.

The simple suggestion would be to stop offering at pitches up, but baseball is unfortunately not that easy. I speculated last season that Judge’s issue with pitches in the upper-third of the zone might have been because of his shoulder ailments, which I still cannot confirm or deny, but seem to now at least be loosely correlated, given Judge’s health and offseason surgery. Could Bellinger be nursing an ailment? Speculating on injury is an art I never want to master given the lack of case-t0-case predictability; it’s a losing proposition. So the alternative is to suggest Bellinger changes elsewhere.

We might be able to accept Bellinger’s upper-third issue if we can hope for improvement elsewhere. His approach from last season to the fastballs he is able to hit was a productive, gap-to-gap approach. That has largely dissipated in the early stages of 2018.

Cody Bellinger four-seam fastball spray chart versus RHP. Data via Baseball Savant.

This is tied to Bellinger’s increase in the total amount of balls he is hitting to his pull side, up about four percent overall and 10 percent versus right-handed pitchers specifically. Simple math suggests Bellinger’s pull-side tendencies must be down versus left-handed pitching, which we can confirm (~10 percent drop from 2017 to 2018). That leads us back to the encouraging case of Bellinger versus left-handed pitching. He seems to be consciously using the whole field, being more patient and laying off breaking balls, but the results haven’t manifested.

Like my Chris Archer column from last week, Bellinger is perplexing. To enhance the confusion, let’s toss in a swing change.

(Videos via Baseball Savant – 1, 2)

Bellinger has always had an upright stance, with a slide-step stride that is one of the main reasons many consider him a rotational, upper-body hitter (as especially explosive one). That hasn’t changed, but what has is the positioning of his bat. While the peak load of his upper body remains similar from the angles I’ve seen thus far, inverting his barrel towards his back shoulder as opposed to keeping it parallel, in theory, lengthens the time from barrel to load.

Seeing this led me towards some confirmation bias of Bellinger increasing his hole against fastballs in the upper-third of the zone. The minor increase in his amount of movement might be throwing his timing off for balls up, which are tough to get to with a longer swing or less-than-plus bat speed. But this application fails to confirm why he’s pulling the ball more versus right-handed pitchers, which suggests he’s getting around on pitches quicker than the previous realization that he’s having trouble with pitches up would suggest.

While I often love GIF’ing up adjustments and suggesting they’re the main reason for emerging success, in Bellinger’s case, I think reversion back to his parallel bat doesn’t fix his issue against high fastballs or his tendency to pull the ball against right-handed pitchers. Both those matters are workable issues he can fix with further mechanical adjustment or a conscious gap-to-gap approach (think early 2017 Kris Bryant for the latter). Rumors of a demotion to Triple-A are radically unnecessary, especially given Bellinger’s ability to play a viable centerfield and the fact that he’s been almost neutral offensively as opposed to holding a liability position like the Austin Barnes or Logan Forsythe.

The league adjusts back to hitters and we’re in the middle of exactly that for Cody Bellinger. Razzball’s Player Rater still views him as a top 75 player for the rest of the season, lower than where you drafted him, but not a player to completely dismiss. I view Bellinger as a plus-plus raw power bat with intriguing statistics against left-handed pitching and the need for further adjustment versus right-handers, both of which suggest my lean towards support of the big lefty.

 

I never slump on Twitter!

@LanceBrozdow

…or InstaGram!

@LanceBroz

34 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Game Of Throws
Game Of Throws
4 years ago

Great write up! I Traded Goldy for Bellinger a couple weeks back. Kicking myself a bit, but hopefully Bellinger can make some adjustments and end in top 75 like you say!

Fred Garvin MP
Fred Garvin MP
4 years ago

The morning before this article came out, I was commenting to Grey that Bellinger looked slower to the ball. Then, I read this excellent article showing why. Tonight Bellinger just hit a homerun. I frame by framed the swing: hands further forward and bat in a more upright position.

There is perhaps no greater joy in watching baseball than when analysis translates to outcomes on the field. Thanks for the excellent read, and I hope this change translates to repeatable mechanics and better outcomes for Cody.

Ozzie Smith
Ozzie Smith
4 years ago

Great post, I was just offered Bellinger for my Acuna in a H2H redraft. Tempting offer as I owned him last year and he carried me several weeks. I have Mazara, Brantley, and Soto currently in my OF and Freeman at 1B so I don’t necessarily need him, but at the same time I have the ability to wait on him and be patient if you think he will be better than Acuna. Thanks buddy!

steve stevenson
steve stevenson
4 years ago

Relatively shallow only-league keepers where we can carry 3 minor leaguers, I have 1 slot open in each. Who do you like best out of the following?

NL – Heliot Ramos, Monte Harrison, Michel Baez, Kieboom
AL – Florial, L. Taveras, Jesus Sanchez, Justus Sheffield, Nick Gordon, Mountcastle

Starz
Starz
4 years ago

I drafted Cody in third round this season and just traded him (and Clevinger) away for Stanton. I think I made the right call. 12 team 5×5 H2H.
Similar to Goldschmidt and Stanton, these players are producing just not at their respective draft value. I have more confidence in the veterans reverting to their norms than Bellinger, but I still think Cody will be fine and top 75 sounds right.

LadyScorpio
LadyScorpio
4 years ago

Good article. Conforto is having a sophomore slump too! He’s slowly been coming to life over the past month.

Starz
Starz
Reply to  LadyScorpio
4 years ago

@LadyScorpio: A little different case for Conforto, who is also not a sophomore. Conforto had his sophomore slump in 2016 and a trip to the minor leagues helped save his season. He’s coming back around now, but more likely as a result of getting 100% and his shoulder stronger.

Dave Wittenauer
Dave Wittenauer
4 years ago

You are writing some unbelievable posts. Amazing stuff.

1 question for you – what do you think the outcome of a duplantier is? Does he end up being a top of the rotation guy? He’s been amazing in lower level minor league games the past couple seasons.

Dave Wittenauer
Dave Wittenauer
Reply to  Lance
4 years ago

@Lance: thanks. Your posts disecting players are full of knowledge. I’m thrilled when I see a new one posted.

I thought of one more for you… :-)

Cavan biggio. I know he lost some of the hokie arm position when he rebuilt his swing and his power doesn’t seem to be going away. It takes a lot to stay somewhat with vlad jr for a third of the season.

Do you think the swing change made him the real deal?

Papa Jean Segura
Papa Jean Segura
4 years ago

Very interesting read. Someone in my league just traded Bellinger and Strasburg for Whit, D. Price, and Braun. What do you think should i have vetoed?

jose H.
jose H.
4 years ago

Lance.
I am Scoresheet player, witch is like playing real baseball. My league is NL only.
I am going to have four of the first six or so picks . I have a fifth pick witch I am going to use to grab Dodger 1B Max Muncy (they plan to use him at 2B in the future).

Going by the draft, my first three picks are no brainers I think:
2- Bart – C – SF
3- Bohm -3B – PHI
5- India -3B – CIN

My fourth pick is more difficult. I love 3B – Nolan Gorman (Cards) and his powerful bat, but that is three 3B and I am having second thoughts.
I know you love RHP Cater Stewart (Atl), please talk me into going that way with my fourth.

What are your thoughts in all the picks? Can you please give me a line or two on each.
Thanks, Jose

jose H.
jose H.
Reply to  Lance
4 years ago

@Lance:
Scoresheet definitely takes defense into account, Scoresheet is a simulated game, they collect all the stats from your players and your opponent’s players and then play the games with their own formulas. Each position player has a defensive range number, for example J.D. Martinez is one of the worst OF and has a defensive range of (2.01), while Billy Hamilton is one of the best defenders (2.20). We also are not crazy about stolen bases, actually most owners would not allow a player to steal unless he has about a 80% success rate.

One of the things I like about Bart , is that they say he has being calling his own games in college and is a good defender and has great power to all fields.

I wanted Madrigal and Libertore, but they both ended up in the A L, with Chicago and Tampa bay respectably. I like Bohm and Bart for the powerful bats and that they both seem to have high OBP also.

I am not crazy about Kelenic, if I am going to go with another bat, I will stay with the slugger Nolan Gorman and hope that either he or Bohm moves to 1B. Also in Scoresheet any infielder can play 1B without a defense penalty.

Stewie
Stewie
4 years ago

Really cool article. Thanks for posting!

LennyDykstraIsJustMisunderstood
LennyDykstraIsJustMisunderstood
4 years ago

wow that is a great analysis……..that heat map says alot

Scott
Scott
4 years ago

Any faith in Margot turning his season around? He seems to be hitting better lately and even walked 3 times yesterday. I can use another OF and he has the most upside of any FA in my league. Not sure if I should chase a hot bat or grab Margot and hope the good stuff comes later and get it on it before it happens. Thanks

Johnnyhobbes
Johnnyhobbes
4 years ago

Lance thanks for the write up. Before this season I had a choice between Cody and Rhys Hoskins for my one bat keeper for this season…… I cant say I definitely made the correct choice or the incorrect one. I would love to see the construction of the analysis with Rhys this year as well. A lot of noise out here in philly on the air waves about taking a player out of their ‘natural’ defensive position will screw up their offensive performance. My question boils down to – are their technical differences between the swing for Rhys? Are pitchers approaching him differently- yes they are but how? and do the magnitude fo these difference say hey- their might be something to the notion of him playing OF instead of 1B. I’m inclined to think yes, the defensive stuff carries over.

Grey
Admin
4 years ago

Great post, Lance!

knucks
knucks
4 years ago

Very well done! Thank you for this.