Player Page Matches
First and foremost, I want you to know I worked very hard on that title. Like, I spent all of 10 minutes on it. That's a million years in Fantasy Sports years so be thankful. Admittedly, I didn't really watch Buffy growing up...or ever for that matter. Believe it or not, not every person who grew up with the 90s as their child/teen playground watched every bad show produced. Dawson's Creek? Nope. Frasier? Eh, got the comedy, but it wasn't my bag. Honestly, Seinfeld, Simpsons, and a plethora of awesome cartoons ruled my World. I'm here to tell you that Duckman was the shizz. Still is today. Also was a fan of The Critic, Ren & Stimpy...basically, cartoons gone wrong worked for me. I guess what I'm trying to say was, Sarah Michelle Gellar didn't do it for me so I had zero reason to watch the show. I'd guess this true of most males my age but what the frick do I know, Duckman and The Critic only lasted 5 seasons total, Buffy 6! Alright, I just finished one of my worst fantasy football drafts with Nick Capozzi, JFOH, and crew and am drifting down the bitter path so let's get back on track. Danny Duffy was a sleeper for some coming into the year. Yeah I don't know why either, I'm just putting that out there. What I do know is that the Orioles on the year K 22.7% of the time against lefties and own a 25.4% K rate to go with an 80 wRC+ over their last 14 days. I wouldn't go anywhere near him in cash but for tourneys, he makes for an intriguing high upside SP2 and at the middling price of $5,600, he allows you to price in all the big bats your heart desires. Obviously it would be a nicer call if Duffy were in KC but beggars can't be choosers when searching sub $6K. So go...heck, I don't know. I'm supposed to make a Buffy reference here. I like SMG in The Grudge, does that count? Let's just roll on. Here's my 'at least it was better than Twilight' hot takes for this Friday DK slate... New to DraftKings? Scared of feeling like a small fish in a big pond? Well try out this 25 teamer of Razzball writers and friends to wet your DK whistle. Just remember to sign up through us before you do. It’s how we know you care! If you still feel helpless and lonely, be sure to subscribe to the DFSBot for your daily baseball plays.
You wanna know what's on my mind?  "If the Nationals wouldn't have shut down Stephen Strasburg three years ago, would they have been eliminated a day earlier this year?"  No, that's not on my mind.  "Is there anything to your business idea of selling 500-foot rulers outside the courthouse to people who just got restraining orders?"  That's been on my mind, but that wasn't what I was thinking about now.  "What does Strasburg offer us for 2016?"  Yes, that was what I was thinking.  How did you read my mind?  "I'm you."   Shh, you're ruining the illusion.  Yesterday, he went 7 1/3 IP, 3 ER, 6 baserunners, 13 Ks.  Prettttay, pretttay good.  Of course, Effin Stressbird has been an ulcer all year with his 4.30 ERA, 1.23 WHIP and continual injuries that have left him with only 98 1/3 IP.  When digging deeper -- and it hurts me soul, Lupe Fiasco, to say this -- he doesn't look bad.  His velocity went up this year to 95.3 MPH from 94.8; his K/9 is down 10.1 to 9.7, but I think that's just due to his control, and a 9.7 K/9 isn't bad.  He hasn't been as sharp with command, but couldn't that be due to the back problems he's fighting?  I hate him as much as anyone that is making hashtags by combining MLK and the dipshit in Kentucky, but if I'm looking at his stats with impartial eyes, he doesn't look terrible for 2016.  For this year, just give me three more effin starts like last night, you Effin Stressbird.  Anyway, here's what else I saw yesterday in fantasy baseball:

Did you ever wonder why, back in your school days, that there was no "E" grade? What happened to "E"? The apparent reason for the lack of an "E" grade is because most systems are based on four passing grades. "A", "B", "C" and "D". After these passing grades come failure, and since failure starts with the letter "F", "F" is used to denote a failure. It's really quite simple. It just happens to be that "F" is the sixth letter, but had it been the tenth or even the last, an "F" would still be used to let you know that you just flunked. Someone who fails is a failure. Does that make someone that flunks a flunky? I actually had a teacher one year, I think it was the 7th grade, that incorporated "E" into his grading system. It was actually higher than an "A", if that makes sense, and stood for "excellent". I always thought that was an A+. I'm pretty sure that teacher was a major pothead. I liked him. I had an entirely different teacher that had a completely different set of grades that included an "E". In this class it stood for "exceeds expectations". There was no "A", "B", "C", "D" or "F". Instead we had "E", "M" and "N". The latter two standing for "meets expectations" and "needs improvement".

It feels like only yesterday when everything was right in the world.  An animated blue bird landed on my window ledge and sung to me about boobies and other things the republicans want to make illegal, then another animated bird joined him and sung to me about foie gras and other things the democrats want to make illegal, then a centrist animated bird landed and said a lot of nothing that could neither be refuted nor approved.  Why do I have all of these damn cartoon birds but no Carlos Carrasco?!  Yesterday, Carrasco hit the DL with a sore shoulder.  This sounds to me like an early shutdown is not too far off.  "Hello, shopping mall ear piercer, can you put a diamond stud in the hole in my heart that Carrasco left?"  Anyway, here's what else I saw yesterday in fantasy baseball:
Jorge Soler is likely done for the year with a strained oblique.  This is one of those injuries that comes with a sigh of relief.  Yay, I don't have to keep running Soler out there and being disappointed.  Disappointment, you are the mistress of expectation, aren't you?  Soler fascinates me in a car crash that you rubber neck while you pass sorta way.  Here's a preseason tweet from Peter Gammons, "John Mallee (Cubs hitting coach) says Jorge Soler hasn't swung at a pitch out of the strike zone all spring.  Scary good.  May be best of Cubs lot right now."  Cubs committed to playing him, and, by the end of the year, you had to wonder if they should've just been committed.  If his year is over, he ends with 7 HRs, 3 SBs and a .265 average in 278 plate appearances.  Worse (yeah, it can get worse), his strikeout rate zoomed, and not in the fun way like Aretha Franklin's zooming.  On our Player Rater, he was about as valuable as Will Venable, Brandon Moss and Jeff Francoeur.  Or make that, as craptastic as those guys.  In 2016, Soler will be one of those guys that goes in the 150 range that could be as valuable as Pollock this year, or as valuable as the Pollock that parked so close to your car you couldn't get in your door and needed to climb through the trunk, knock down the backseat and crawl through to the steering wheel.  Time, not the magazine, will tell.  Anyway, here's what else I saw yesterday in fantasy baseball:
I was able to pick up Pedro Alvarez (2-for-4, 19th homer) for the batty call yesterday, which is kinda silly since he has four homers in the last week, and now I don't see how I can drop him.  Wouldn't be the first time a batty call turned into living with each other for a few years, until the fighting becomes too much for each us.  But we're not brave enough to leave, so we bitterly sleep with our backs to each other, and when Pedro falls asleep before me, I pull out my iPad, lower the volume so he can't hear the sites I'm visiting and I excite my "Josh Reddick" until my "Marcus Semien" arrives and I cry myself to sleep.  Or something along those lines!  *giggles awkwardly, coughs, clears throat*  So, yes, that's a vote for Pedro (just don't get married to him).  Seriously, he's hitting .252 with 19 homers, how is he only owned in 50% of leagues?  Not to answer, but to judge others.  Anyway, here's what else I saw yesterday in fantasy baseball:
Yesterday, Brandon Crawford went 2-for-5, 2 runs, 3 RBIs with two homers (17, 18). Crawford has a big flashing sign over his head that reads, "Career Year." Under said sign, he has a smaller sign that reads, "Or could this be a legitimate breakout?" Under that sign, there's yet another sign that reads, "There is no third sign." Then under that there's a smaller sign that reads, "Is that meta? Why even go through the trouble of hanging a third sign?" Then there's yet another smaller sign that reads...Ugh, I can't even read it, the font is too small. Let's stick with the signs we can read and that make sense, "Career year" and "Or could this be a legitimate breakout?" His previous career high was 10 homers in 153 games last year, and prior to that he had never homered ten times in any professional league. In four full years with the Giants, he only had 26 homers coming into this season. That was in over 1800 plate appearances. His previous career high in HR/FB% was 7%. This year it's over 17%. He's in the top 30 in the league for homers per fly balls. For the most part, a guy who hits a lot of homers per fly balls are, as you can imagine, not guys that had a previous high of ten homers in over 1800 plate appearances. They're guys like Just Dong, Braun, Te(i)x, Miggy, etc. etc. etc. The homers will disappear, but I wouldn't mind so much if Crawford was more than a .255 hitter. The most obvious comp is a young J.J. Hardy, if he was an actual comp, but he's not. Hardy hit 26 homers in his 2nd full season, Crawford never came close to this before, and I don't think he ever will again. So...*picks up megaphone* All right, guys, let's lose all the signs, except the first one. And get back to work! Ugh, teamsters. Anyway, here's what else I saw yesterday in fantasy baseball:
Yesterday, Latos was traded to the Dodgers, then not traded. Then CarGo was traded to the Mets, then not traded. Then Cole Hamels was traded to the Rangers, and really traded, I think. I don't know, I'm dizzy. Ruin Tomorrow Jr. was sad to see Hamels go, but this is the business he chose, after getting fired from Duane Reade for mixing up the garbage with "the important stuff." And after getting fired for explaining to kids there is no Santa, after being dressed as the mall Santa. After being fired as Ruin Tomorrow Sr.'s personal assistant, but he maintains that was a misunderstanding. He thought, "Don't tell your mother," meant, "Don't tell your mother until you see her." After his no-hitter the other day, I said, "(Hamels's) peripherals look fine and he’s just getting a tad unlucky. I could see someone thinking they’re selling high after this no-hitter, but Hamels is a low-3 ERA pitcher with a 9.6 K/9, i.e., a low-end fantasy ace." And that's me quoting me! I would've preferred to see him go to the NL, but Arlington is about a push with Citizens Bank and could see him stringing together a sub-3 ERA for two months. Jorge Alfaro, Jerad Eickhoff and Nick Williams were acquired by the Phils, and I'm sure Prospect Mike will go over them, after he gets their posters up in his living room. Anyway, here's what else I saw yesterday in fantasy baseball:
Jonathan Papelbon has a contract that insures that he remains the closer if he's traded. He would likely be the closer in Washington even without that stipulation, but it's so like Papelbon to have that in his contract. Should just call that the douche clause. To fix him, the Nationals should bring him into games where they're up one run in the seventh and run him out there for three innings every night until his arm falls off. Sure, they'd cost themselves a closer and games, but isn't spite worth it? I know it is when Cougs says she has a headache and I say, "Fine, I'm gonna sleep in the bathtub!" Sure, I could stay in the bed, or even opt for a couch, but the spite wouldn't be driven home as well. Papelbon's trade obviously kills all value for Drew Storen. Shame, his career feels like the exact opposite of Fernando Rodney. No matter how well Storen pitches every year he seems to lose the job for some unforeseen reason. Maybe he can figure out a way to work into his contract, "Must pitch after any white guy that is a terrible dancer whether that is Mark Madsen, Grey Albright or Papelbon." Of course, in Philly, this means that Ken Giles gets his long-deserved chance to close for the Phils. All three games where they're leading. Anyway, here's what else I saw yesterday in fantasy baseball:
A NASA engineer who plays fantasy, "Houston, we've Scott a pitcher!" Then he tries to high-five another NASA engineer, but their 180 IQs can't figure out a hand slap. A gay man in the Bay Area who plays fantasy, "I see a run on Minute Maid mimosas thanks to the Kaztro!" Then he tries to high-five his friend and it becomes patty cake. A Real Housewife of Houston sees that Scott Kazmir was traded to the Astros and gets on the phone with her husband, "You want me to hide our oil futures in which bank account again?" Okay, that had nothing to do with Kazmir. For the past three months, I've been saying to trade Kazmir in July and guess who reads Razzball. Yo, Beane, I'm on a treadmill as I write this -- simpatico, my brother! Crap, I just hit 'Begin Workout.' How do I shut this off? I just wanted to stand on the treadmill! So, Kazmir takes his 2.38 ERA to Houston and I can kinda understand it from the Astros' perspective. If they get ten starts from him instead of Feldman, then it's a score since they traded low-level prospects. Kazmir is from Houston so he'll be able to play in front of family and friends, which is great if this were Little League and needed a ride home. He has only 15 1/3 IP in The Juice Box, so his numbers there are irrelevant. O.co is a -co park like Petco or Metco and stands for Overstock(ed on foul territory), but Minute Maid isn't exactly Coors. Keuchel, McHugh, McCullers and Velasquez have done fine there, and I think this is a fairly lateral move out of the wishbone offense. What?! Grey must be reading JayWrong's fantasy football rankings. The only thing that really stops Kazmir from performing is his health, which is almost definitely going to fail him. Damn, I should've been a doctor. Anyway, here's what else I saw yesterday in fantasy baseball:
"Who is the Dodgers ace?" asks the Fox Sports newscaster in Los Angeles, after the special report on "Where are the stars shopping for their Emmy gowns?" and "Juicing? Is it good for you?" and "A high-speed pursuit ends in an In-N-Out drive-thru," and "Actresses over 24 years old may not be washed up after all," and "Shopkeeper puts up sign to 'Vote Republican' and gets looted." So, who is the Dodgers ace? On Saturday, Clayton Kershaw went 8 IP, 0 ER, 3 baserunners with 14 Ks, ERA down to 2.68. My Magic Eight Ball says this is the year the Dodgers hop on Kershaw's back, march through the playoffs and justify every crackers move Mattingly's done in his managerial career. Sometimes knowing the future really bums me out. Not to be outdone, on Sunday, Zack Greinke went 8 IP, 0 ER, 4 baserunners with 11 Ks, and lowered his ERA to 1.30. Soon he won't be able to lower his ERA anymore (math is my strong suit). I'm totally done doubting Greinke...or am I?! No, not the ellipsis reversal! Ah! As I ranked in the top 100 for the 2nd half, Kershaw is way above Greinke in terms of, well, everything. Greinke is also not a 1.30 ERA pitcher, but no one really is, except maybe Kershaw. Greinke is definitely a number one though; this isn't all luck. He has a 8+ K/9, 1.4 BB/9 and 3.05 xFIP, which is essentially nice, aw sooky, nice. A "nice aw sooky" sandwich, if you will. Then there's the fact that Greinke hasn't allowed a run in 43 2/3 IP. Orel Hershiser doesn't scoff at that, maybe he yawns, then does a small double take when no one is looking. Anyway, here's what else I saw this weekend in fantasy baseball:
I sat down Friday night and started watching Shark Tank for the first time. Wow, have I been missing out on a beautiful reality show. No B.S., I have been binge watching it all weekend. I know, I know, Grey has been pimping this reality masterpiece for years. Grey, you were right and I won't doubt your reality lotharioness ever again. This show got me thinking about how I choose my creeper and how in some ways that I am the shark. I'm looking at numbers and schedules every week to buy the creeper. Based on the arguments in my head, I choose my player to invest in. Pretty easy. Now, what would you guys... and girls think of this new concept I thought of yesterday while chatting with Grey? Each week next season, instead of one contributor picking a creeper, we have several contributors each make one sell for a creeper? Take all those sells and combine them into one post and you peeps can decide what creeper you believe in. Just a thought.