Comments on: Rookies for 2009 Fantasy Baseball http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/ Fantasy Baseball Advice Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:33:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Grey http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-27028 Grey Sat, 21 Mar 2009 05:23:42 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=4394#comment-27028 @<a href="#comment-27024" rel="nofollow">James</a>: I agree. I think he's back by May. @James: I agree. I think he’s back by May.

]]> By: James http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-27024 James Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:02:45 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=4394#comment-27024 Could the demotion of Price be a blessing in disguise for fantasy owners? Couldn’t the Rays be sending him down to baby him in an effort to have him during the stretch run? Thus, instead of being shut down at the end of the season, fantasy owners will have him in their lineup during their playoff/stretch run. What do you guys think? Could the demotion of Price be a blessing in disguise for fantasy owners? Couldn’t the Rays be sending him down to baby him in an effort to have him during the stretch run? Thus, instead of being shut down at the end of the season, fantasy owners will have him in their lineup during their playoff/stretch run. What do you guys think?

]]> By: Grey http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-26975 Grey Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:02:09 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=4394#comment-26975 @<a href="#comment-26966" rel="nofollow">kevin</a>: He's a >10 HRs >.260 catcher, not something you want in mixed leagues and only as a late round sleeper in NL-Only if you've punted catcher or if you're in a 2 catcher league. @kevin: He’s a >10 HRs >.260 catcher, not something you want in mixed leagues and only as a late round sleeper in NL-Only if you’ve punted catcher or if you’re in a 2 catcher league.

]]> By: kevin http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-26966 kevin Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:29:33 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=4394#comment-26966 @Grey Just stumbled on John Baker, C for FLA. I can't find any scoop on him, but his '08 numbers are insane, and his last few years in the minors are great too. Sooooo, what's the scizzoop? Why is he so hard to find info on? @Grey
Just stumbled on John Baker, C for FLA. I can’t find any scoop on him, but his ‘08 numbers are insane, and his last few years in the minors are great too. Sooooo, what’s the scizzoop? Why is he so hard to find info on?

]]> By: Grey http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-24418 Grey Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:56:07 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=4394#comment-24418 @<a href="#comment-24417" rel="nofollow">Steve</a>: Sounds like I've taught you well, Young Jedi. @Steve: Sounds like I’ve taught you well, Young Jedi.

]]> By: Steve http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-24417 Steve Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:15:36 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=4394#comment-24417 @Grey: Thanks. Don't really feel the need to go early on Sandoval as Clement and co can be had pretty late if I miss him. Think I will wait til his ranking spot or thereabouts - Iannetta may even still be there. Hard to think of taking a catcher at 120 - even if it is Doumit or V-Mart. I'm normally looking for a second or third starter or hopefully Broxton at that point. @Grey: Thanks. Don’t really feel the need to go early on Sandoval as Clement and co can be had pretty late if I miss him. Think I will wait til his ranking spot or thereabouts – Iannetta may even still be there.
Hard to think of taking a catcher at 120 – even if it is Doumit or V-Mart. I’m normally looking for a second or third starter or hopefully Broxton at that point.

]]> By: Grey http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-24412 Grey Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:18:43 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=4394#comment-24412 @<a href="#comment-24389" rel="nofollow">Steve</a>: I'd go to about 130 with Sandoval if I really wanted him but that 166 is considering Catcher eligibility. Iannetta is in the prior tier so he should go a bit earlier. I wouldn't grab him much earlier than 120 though. Actually, I wouldn't grab many catchers before 120 unless the big guys fell to me. @Steve: I’d go to about 130 with Sandoval if I really wanted him but that 166 is considering Catcher eligibility. Iannetta is in the prior tier so he should go a bit earlier. I wouldn’t grab him much earlier than 120 though. Actually, I wouldn’t grab many catchers before 120 unless the big guys fell to me.

]]> By: Steve http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-24389 Steve Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:55:35 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=4394#comment-24389 @<a href="#comment-24383" rel="nofollow">Grey</a>: You've got Sandoval ranked at 166 overall which equates to about the 13th round or so (a little simplistic I know) in a 12-teamer. He has C eligibility in my H2H league (12 teams), so all other things being equal is that about the right place to take him? Where would you looking to take Iannetta? @Grey: You’ve got Sandoval ranked at 166 overall which equates to about the 13th round or so (a little simplistic I know) in a 12-teamer. He has C eligibility in my H2H league (12 teams), so all other things being equal is that about the right place to take him?

Where would you looking to take Iannetta?

]]> By: Grey http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-24383 Grey Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:21:14 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=4394#comment-24383 @<a href="#comment-24379" rel="nofollow">Steve</a>: Yeah, he'd be there too. @Steve: Yeah, he’d be there too.

]]> By: Steve http://razzball.com/rookies-for-2009-fantasy-baseball/comment-page-1/#comment-24379 Steve Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:25:24 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=4394#comment-24379 @Grey: Iannetta? Or however you spell his damn name. @Grey: Iannetta? Or however you spell his damn name.

]]>