<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Razzball Reader Poll Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=razzball-reader-poll-results-2012</link>
	<description>Fantasy Baseball Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisV82</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1219426</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisV82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1219426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@The Talented Mr. Dope Man, Oops, my bad, I forgot Quality Starts]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The Talented Mr. Dope Man, Oops, my bad, I forgot Quality Starts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3FingersBrown</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1217079</link>
		<dc:creator>3FingersBrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1217079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rabbit, I&#039;m not saying one style is better than another, simply that I enjoy H2H more - precisely for the reasons you dislike it. In sports, luck is a big part of any championship team. Ask the Super Bowl champion NY Giants or last year&#039;s Cardinals. 

While there is luck involved (I have a secret - there&#039;s luck involved with roto too: ask anyone who drafted say Ryan Zimmerman last year) in H2H, there are also different strategies involved which make for a different style of play. That&#039;s exactly why I believe Razzball should cover H2H more - as you said &quot;more and better information.&quot;

For the same reason you play Bridge, I play Texas Hold &#039;Em and dabble at the dice table. I like to gamble. That said, in &#039;09 and &#039;10 I won back to back championships in a competitive 12-team H2H keeper league. Last year I lost in the finals. In 5 years in the league, I&#039;ve never failed to make the playoffs. Tell me it doesn&#039;t take some kind of skill to consistently succeed in a competitive H2H league. I dare you. I double-dog dare you!

Anyway, that&#039;s my rant. Razzball is the king of fantasy sports sites regardless of what formats you cover!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rabbit, I&#8217;m not saying one style is better than another, simply that I enjoy H2H more &#8211; precisely for the reasons you dislike it. In sports, luck is a big part of any championship team. Ask the Super Bowl champion NY Giants or last year&#8217;s Cardinals. </p>
<p>While there is luck involved (I have a secret &#8211; there&#8217;s luck involved with roto too: ask anyone who drafted say Ryan Zimmerman last year) in H2H, there are also different strategies involved which make for a different style of play. That&#8217;s exactly why I believe Razzball should cover H2H more &#8211; as you said &#8220;more and better information.&#8221;</p>
<p>For the same reason you play Bridge, I play Texas Hold &#8216;Em and dabble at the dice table. I like to gamble. That said, in &#8217;09 and &#8217;10 I won back to back championships in a competitive 12-team H2H keeper league. Last year I lost in the finals. In 5 years in the league, I&#8217;ve never failed to make the playoffs. Tell me it doesn&#8217;t take some kind of skill to consistently succeed in a competitive H2H league. I dare you. I double-dog dare you!</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s my rant. Razzball is the king of fantasy sports sites regardless of what formats you cover!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1216941</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1216941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the poll is a little biased in the since that what leagues actually do doesn&#039;t always reflect what some participants would want.  I know that at least 5 out of 12 of the people in my head to head keeper league have strongly advocated for Rotisserie to no avail.  The others like head to head better because of the &quot;weekly excitement&quot; and since we need them to have any league at all we concede.  Just thought I&#039;d make you aware in case you didn&#039;t think about this possibility.  Love the site, keep it up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the poll is a little biased in the since that what leagues actually do doesn&#8217;t always reflect what some participants would want.  I know that at least 5 out of 12 of the people in my head to head keeper league have strongly advocated for Rotisserie to no avail.  The others like head to head better because of the &#8220;weekly excitement&#8221; and since we need them to have any league at all we concede.  Just thought I&#8217;d make you aware in case you didn&#8217;t think about this possibility.  Love the site, keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1216876</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1216876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I play H2H points and I think that the reason it is gaining popularity is because of fantasy football.   My league is a spin-off of my ffootball league, and people were just more familiar with that format.  I doubt we will ever go into roto.

It would be great to see a series on H2H points (strategy, ranking, tips, etc).

I am a  avid follower of your site.  Thanks and keep up the good work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I play H2H points and I think that the reason it is gaining popularity is because of fantasy football.   My league is a spin-off of my ffootball league, and people were just more familiar with that format.  I doubt we will ever go into roto.</p>
<p>It would be great to see a series on H2H points (strategy, ranking, tips, etc).</p>
<p>I am a  avid follower of your site.  Thanks and keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Riptide</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1216716</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Riptide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1216716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rudy Gamble, I guess it won&#039;t be a good cat for straight roto leagues because of innings caps and the like. My league has 14 categories (7x7) and is a weekly start league because we all have jobs, kids, and wives (lame, I know. And we&#039;re not Mormons, so it&#039;s just one wife per owner). It&#039;s an eleven team league, and during each scoring period you play against every other team. Each category is a win, so going 70-70 is a .500 week and going 140-0 is perfection. If you started the season with 3 weeks of 70-70, your record would be 210-210. It&#039;s sort of like a head to head league and a roto league had a one-night stand and produced a child. 

As always, a few guys near the back of the pack will implement their cruise-control settings in late July or August. Since you play every team every week, there is no advantage to be gained by anyone. And since there is no roto scoring, no one can simply just leapfrog the dead teams in certain categories to be able to catch you just because others have abandoned their teams.

We have five SP slots and 2 RP slots. Starting marginal pitchers because they have 2 starts that week may seem appealing because of the chance for more K&#039;s, W&#039;s, or QS&#039;s, but the damage they do to ERA, WHIP, and Innings divided by games started will make all owners think twice.

I agree that innings divided by games started isn&#039;t as good for straight roto as it is for our strange bastard-child of a league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rudy Gamble, I guess it won&#8217;t be a good cat for straight roto leagues because of innings caps and the like. My league has 14 categories (7&#215;7) and is a weekly start league because we all have jobs, kids, and wives (lame, I know. And we&#8217;re not Mormons, so it&#8217;s just one wife per owner). It&#8217;s an eleven team league, and during each scoring period you play against every other team. Each category is a win, so going 70-70 is a .500 week and going 140-0 is perfection. If you started the season with 3 weeks of 70-70, your record would be 210-210. It&#8217;s sort of like a head to head league and a roto league had a one-night stand and produced a child. </p>
<p>As always, a few guys near the back of the pack will implement their cruise-control settings in late July or August. Since you play every team every week, there is no advantage to be gained by anyone. And since there is no roto scoring, no one can simply just leapfrog the dead teams in certain categories to be able to catch you just because others have abandoned their teams.</p>
<p>We have five SP slots and 2 RP slots. Starting marginal pitchers because they have 2 starts that week may seem appealing because of the chance for more K&#8217;s, W&#8217;s, or QS&#8217;s, but the damage they do to ERA, WHIP, and Innings divided by games started will make all owners think twice.</p>
<p>I agree that innings divided by games started isn&#8217;t as good for straight roto as it is for our strange bastard-child of a league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Gamble</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1216693</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1216693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Arod&#039;s Frost, Nope, doesn&#039;t change anything.  Think of classic Ichiro as a 3/5th guy (great on R/AVG/SB, bad on HR/RBI).  Now he turns into a 4/7th guy (add H to numerator, add H and OPS to denominator). That goes from 0.6 to 0.57.

I think the only thing I&#039;d focus a little more on is high AB guys since that should help H/R/RBI.  I don&#039;t trust Mauer to put up high ABs...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Arod&#8217;s Frost, Nope, doesn&#8217;t change anything.  Think of classic Ichiro as a 3/5th guy (great on R/AVG/SB, bad on HR/RBI).  Now he turns into a 4/7th guy (add H to numerator, add H and OPS to denominator). That goes from 0.6 to 0.57.</p>
<p>I think the only thing I&#8217;d focus a little more on is high AB guys since that should help H/R/RBI.  I don&#8217;t trust Mauer to put up high ABs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muchaco</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1216121</link>
		<dc:creator>Muchaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1216121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting H2H discussions here.   I&#039;m 100% a roto guy and have never understood the draw of H2H with Fantasy Baseball, I almost think it&#039;s spill over from Fantasy Football.   I completely get H2H for Football as it mirrors the weekly setup that the sport has, but for MLB, a sport with 163 games (as opposed to 16) to me, lends itself much more to Roto.

Great idea to do this Rudy - I know it helps you and Grey focus your content more to your readership, but this is interesting data for us readers to see as well.  Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting H2H discussions here.   I&#8217;m 100% a roto guy and have never understood the draw of H2H with Fantasy Baseball, I almost think it&#8217;s spill over from Fantasy Football.   I completely get H2H for Football as it mirrors the weekly setup that the sport has, but for MLB, a sport with 163 games (as opposed to 16) to me, lends itself much more to Roto.</p>
<p>Great idea to do this Rudy &#8211; I know it helps you and Grey focus your content more to your readership, but this is interesting data for us readers to see as well.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hats For Bats</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1216045</link>
		<dc:creator>Hats For Bats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1216045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rudy Gamble, Hold Me Closer should be the name of it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rudy Gamble, Hold Me Closer should be the name of it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Gamble</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215988</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Eric Riptide, hmm.  i like it isn&#039;t a counting stat (like QS) which just further incents shitty staffs to load up on SPs for W/K.  I prefer leagues with IP caps or weekly transactions to avoid this.  But adding this rate stat provides the opposite incentive.  You minimize starts to only good ones to max ERA/WHIP/this stat.  so i&#039;d prefer 5 stats with ip cap... .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric Riptide, hmm.  i like it isn&#8217;t a counting stat (like QS) which just further incents shitty staffs to load up on SPs for W/K.  I prefer leagues with IP caps or weekly transactions to avoid this.  But adding this rate stat provides the opposite incentive.  You minimize starts to only good ones to max ERA/WHIP/this stat.  so i&#8217;d prefer 5 stats with ip cap&#8230; .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Gamble</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215962</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Disco, yes i like that idea]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Disco, yes i like that idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Gamble</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215960</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Eddy, i think OBP for AVG makes sense.  if i had one league, i&#039;d def consider it.  but we do so many leagues that it&#039;s more efficient to stick with the same 5x5.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eddy, i think OBP for AVG makes sense.  if i had one league, i&#8217;d def consider it.  but we do so many leagues that it&#8217;s more efficient to stick with the same 5&#215;5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve b</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215955</link>
		<dc:creator>steve b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@chata.All my leagues are estabished so no one quits.I dont play public leagues anymore because that always happened]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chata.All my leagues are estabished so no one quits.I dont play public leagues anymore because that always happened</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Riptide</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215868</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Riptide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rudy, You mentioned that you couldn&#039;t find an extra pitching cat that you liked. CBS offers a stat called &quot;Innings Divided by Games Started&quot;. It&#039;s a fun category because the big innings eaters are given a little more focus in the draft. After all, going eight innings is more impressive than going 6. Rewarding it is fair. It almost makes Carl Pavano worth starting. Almost. The things that make this category aggravating are the  very long rain delays that end your pitcher&#039;s day after a few innings. That, and pinch hitters in the 5th or 6th inning. Yet, all that stuff happens to everyone over the course of the year.

I like quality starts, but it drives me crazy that 6 innings pitched and 3 earned runs is a quality start, but 9 innings and 4 earned runs is NOT a quality start despite being a half-point better in ERA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rudy, You mentioned that you couldn&#8217;t find an extra pitching cat that you liked. CBS offers a stat called &#8220;Innings Divided by Games Started&#8221;. It&#8217;s a fun category because the big innings eaters are given a little more focus in the draft. After all, going eight innings is more impressive than going 6. Rewarding it is fair. It almost makes Carl Pavano worth starting. Almost. The things that make this category aggravating are the  very long rain delays that end your pitcher&#8217;s day after a few innings. That, and pinch hitters in the 5th or 6th inning. Yet, all that stuff happens to everyone over the course of the year.</p>
<p>I like quality starts, but it drives me crazy that 6 innings pitched and 3 earned runs is a quality start, but 9 innings and 4 earned runs is NOT a quality start despite being a half-point better in ERA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabbit</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215784</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rudy Gamble, I just replied to another post by 3FingersBrown and Steve B below that laid out my reasons for muchly preferring roto over H2H.  The luck element is key to my dissatisfaction with H2H--in my football fantasy league  this past season my team had the best power ranking throughout the season, and actually maintained that top ranking through the end of the playoffs, but I lost in the semis to another team that had its best showing (by far) of the entire season against me that week (including getting 39 points from its defense).  I find that really frustrating and it detracts from the game--and if I were on the other side (the lucky team), I wouldn&#039;t find that result particularly gratifying, because it was dumb luck, not any great move or strategy by me, that gave me the win.  

This issue reminds me of the reason I found duplicate bridge to be the best card game there is.  (And no, I&#039;m not 75 years old--I played bridge with friends in college, and one summer a college buddy and I played duplicate in a local club--we were 20 years old, and the next yougest people were about 65.  But they sure knew how to play cards.)  In duplicate, you have numerous tables, and the cards for each table are dealt out at the beginning of the night, and the cards stay the same throughout the night for the table.  Each team moves from table to table, so that you play different cards each hand, but--and here&#039;s the key--you play the same cards that other bridge teams played either earlier or later that night.  At the end of the night, your score is determined by whether you did better--or worse--than other teams playing the same hand.  So if you made &quot;game&quot; with one hand, and no other team did, you got the most points.  The key is that it took luck out of the equation--with most card games if you get dealt a lucky hand you can beat a better player, but with duplicate you play the same hand as everyone else, so it&#039;s totally about the skill, and nothing about luck.  To me, that&#039;s what makes an interesting game, and that&#039;s why H2H can never be as good as roto--too much luck.

Because Razzball is about getting more and better infomration than the other guy, and is not about just getting lucky, I&#039;d suggest you guys keep focusing on roto rather that H2H.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rudy Gamble, I just replied to another post by 3FingersBrown and Steve B below that laid out my reasons for muchly preferring roto over H2H.  The luck element is key to my dissatisfaction with H2H&#8211;in my football fantasy league  this past season my team had the best power ranking throughout the season, and actually maintained that top ranking through the end of the playoffs, but I lost in the semis to another team that had its best showing (by far) of the entire season against me that week (including getting 39 points from its defense).  I find that really frustrating and it detracts from the game&#8211;and if I were on the other side (the lucky team), I wouldn&#8217;t find that result particularly gratifying, because it was dumb luck, not any great move or strategy by me, that gave me the win.  </p>
<p>This issue reminds me of the reason I found duplicate bridge to be the best card game there is.  (And no, I&#8217;m not 75 years old&#8211;I played bridge with friends in college, and one summer a college buddy and I played duplicate in a local club&#8211;we were 20 years old, and the next yougest people were about 65.  But they sure knew how to play cards.)  In duplicate, you have numerous tables, and the cards for each table are dealt out at the beginning of the night, and the cards stay the same throughout the night for the table.  Each team moves from table to table, so that you play different cards each hand, but&#8211;and here&#8217;s the key&#8211;you play the same cards that other bridge teams played either earlier or later that night.  At the end of the night, your score is determined by whether you did better&#8211;or worse&#8211;than other teams playing the same hand.  So if you made &#8220;game&#8221; with one hand, and no other team did, you got the most points.  The key is that it took luck out of the equation&#8211;with most card games if you get dealt a lucky hand you can beat a better player, but with duplicate you play the same hand as everyone else, so it&#8217;s totally about the skill, and nothing about luck.  To me, that&#8217;s what makes an interesting game, and that&#8217;s why H2H can never be as good as roto&#8211;too much luck.</p>
<p>Because Razzball is about getting more and better infomration than the other guy, and is not about just getting lucky, I&#8217;d suggest you guys keep focusing on roto rather that H2H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disco</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215780</link>
		<dc:creator>Disco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Rudy, in your last thread I mentioned I was in a league that added Outs as a pitching category to a weekly set lineup of 4 SP 2 RP and 2 P.  You suggested going with starters in both the P spots because of the new category, taking this a step further would you think going with Neftali or some other RP-eligible starter in one of the relief spots is a good idea?  It would almost certainly sew up outs, and I can still compete any given week in saves from the right closer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rudy, in your last thread I mentioned I was in a league that added Outs as a pitching category to a weekly set lineup of 4 SP 2 RP and 2 P.  You suggested going with starters in both the P spots because of the new category, taking this a step further would you think going with Neftali or some other RP-eligible starter in one of the relief spots is a good idea?  It would almost certainly sew up outs, and I can still compete any given week in saves from the right closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chata</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215763</link>
		<dc:creator>chata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[one of the major drawbacks with the h2h is that owners who quit the
league have a greater and disproportionate impact on the results , than
if they were quitting on a roto league .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of the major drawbacks with the h2h is that owners who quit the<br />
league have a greater and disproportionate impact on the results , than<br />
if they were quitting on a roto league .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arod's Frost</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215762</link>
		<dc:creator>Arod's Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rudy,

In a 7x6 league where the offensive categories are:
H, R, HR, RBI, OPS, AVG, and SB how highly would you value high average guys?

Do Sandoval and Mauer types go up a couple rounds to you?

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy,</p>
<p>In a 7&#215;6 league where the offensive categories are:<br />
H, R, HR, RBI, OPS, AVG, and SB how highly would you value high average guys?</p>
<p>Do Sandoval and Mauer types go up a couple rounds to you?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chata</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215745</link>
		<dc:creator>chata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Fitz, 

i can understand &#039;why&#039; all the cbs points-league players 
are looking elsewhere for their information .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fitz, </p>
<p>i can understand &#8216;why&#8217; all the cbs points-league players<br />
are looking elsewhere for their information .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabbit</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215742</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@3FingersBrown, I gotta disagree with you guys on this issue--I find roto _much_ more enjoyable that H2H. While it may be true that H2H mirrors the luck factor in the real MLB playoffs, I don&#039;t think that makes it better format--the luck factor in the playoffs may make it much more entertaining from a spectator&#039;s perspective, but I would think it makes it much more frustrating from an owners/GM&#039;s perspective.  In Moneyball (the book--haven&#039;t seen the movie so I don&#039;t know if this made it into it) Billy Beane says that he finds the playoffs frustrating, because there&#039;s so much luck involved in winning a playoff series so his sabermetric-based approach doesn&#039;t necessarily work better (not enough games in a series for the statistical approach to win out in the long run).  Given that most (all?) serious fantasy baseballers are heavy stat-heads that adopt some variation of the sabermetric approach, I would think most (all) would prefer the system that minimizes luck and rewards the owner who uses stats to win in the long run.  So, I found it surprising that so many Razzball readers participated in H2H leagues.  

Overall, on the issue of H2H being more authentic, I&#039;d say that sometimes authentic isn&#039;t always better.  When I was in grad school, there were a bunch of people I knew who loved this one little Mexican restaurant in Providence because it was &quot;authentic&quot; Mexican--you could get goat meat tacos there, the menus were all in Spanish, the wait staff didn&#039;t speak a lick of English, it was unclear what many of the sauces on the table were made out of, etc.  I actually hated the place--goat meat actually tastes shitty, and the food in general there seemed like it was made from lesser-quality ingredients.  I have no doubt that that restaurant was more like a real neighborhood restaurant in Mexico City.  But that didn&#039;t make it good, just &quot;authentic.&quot;  I&#039;ll take Chile&#039;s instead any day, and twice on Muesday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@3FingersBrown, I gotta disagree with you guys on this issue&#8211;I find roto _much_ more enjoyable that H2H. While it may be true that H2H mirrors the luck factor in the real MLB playoffs, I don&#8217;t think that makes it better format&#8211;the luck factor in the playoffs may make it much more entertaining from a spectator&#8217;s perspective, but I would think it makes it much more frustrating from an owners/GM&#8217;s perspective.  In Moneyball (the book&#8211;haven&#8217;t seen the movie so I don&#8217;t know if this made it into it) Billy Beane says that he finds the playoffs frustrating, because there&#8217;s so much luck involved in winning a playoff series so his sabermetric-based approach doesn&#8217;t necessarily work better (not enough games in a series for the statistical approach to win out in the long run).  Given that most (all?) serious fantasy baseballers are heavy stat-heads that adopt some variation of the sabermetric approach, I would think most (all) would prefer the system that minimizes luck and rewards the owner who uses stats to win in the long run.  So, I found it surprising that so many Razzball readers participated in H2H leagues.  </p>
<p>Overall, on the issue of H2H being more authentic, I&#8217;d say that sometimes authentic isn&#8217;t always better.  When I was in grad school, there were a bunch of people I knew who loved this one little Mexican restaurant in Providence because it was &#8220;authentic&#8221; Mexican&#8211;you could get goat meat tacos there, the menus were all in Spanish, the wait staff didn&#8217;t speak a lick of English, it was unclear what many of the sauces on the table were made out of, etc.  I actually hated the place&#8211;goat meat actually tastes shitty, and the food in general there seemed like it was made from lesser-quality ingredients.  I have no doubt that that restaurant was more like a real neighborhood restaurant in Mexico City.  But that didn&#8217;t make it good, just &#8220;authentic.&#8221;  I&#8217;ll take Chile&#8217;s instead any day, and twice on Muesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215674</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@SwaggerJackers, 

Uggla is another good example. At the very least, it mitigates the damage of ultra low AVG guys. Danny Espinosa and Drew Stubbs, while wailing away in the .250s, have an OBP in the .320s. Not the greatest, but it won&#039;t drown you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SwaggerJackers, </p>
<p>Uggla is another good example. At the very least, it mitigates the damage of ultra low AVG guys. Danny Espinosa and Drew Stubbs, while wailing away in the .250s, have an OBP in the .320s. Not the greatest, but it won&#8217;t drown you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheNewGuy</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215660</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNewGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading all these H2H comments it makes me sure I wanna join one a H2H league for the first time this year. Meant to last year but ended up with only rotos...anyone in any H2H leagues they recommend with spaces? Would prefer a little money to be involved to spice things up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading all these H2H comments it makes me sure I wanna join one a H2H league for the first time this year. Meant to last year but ended up with only rotos&#8230;anyone in any H2H leagues they recommend with spaces? Would prefer a little money to be involved to spice things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheNewGuy</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215643</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNewGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@SwaggerJackers, Carlos Santana!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SwaggerJackers, Carlos Santana!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3FingersBrown</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215628</link>
		<dc:creator>3FingersBrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@steve b, I agree. H2H matchups make for what I feel is a more authentic experience of managing a baseball team. The best team doesn&#039;t always win. H2H matchups against opposing teams become more important and injuries impact more. It also allows you a little more patience for players off to slow starts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@steve b, I agree. H2H matchups make for what I feel is a more authentic experience of managing a baseball team. The best team doesn&#8217;t always win. H2H matchups against opposing teams become more important and injuries impact more. It also allows you a little more patience for players off to slow starts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheNewGuy</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215617</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNewGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Matt, Me too man...sportingnews rocked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt, Me too man&#8230;sportingnews rocked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheNewGuy</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215612</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNewGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Matt, Me too man me too...sportingnews rocked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt, Me too man me too&#8230;sportingnews rocked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwaggerJackers</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215608</link>
		<dc:creator>SwaggerJackers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Eddy, OBP also does wonders for guys like Reynolds too.  Anyone else come to mind?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eddy, OBP also does wonders for guys like Reynolds too.  Anyone else come to mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwaggerJackers</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215602</link>
		<dc:creator>SwaggerJackers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Eddy, You lose just as many matchups with those rogue RP wins too......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eddy, You lose just as many matchups with those rogue RP wins too&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve b</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215601</link>
		<dc:creator>steve b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont like cbs because its weekly.I like to have control of my players everyday.And ESPN is kind of klunky and I dont like their draft app.The player ratings seem off too.I dont see how you can say roto is more realistic.Teams dont add up at the end of the year who has the most points.They have to win more games than the other teams and adjust for slumps,pitching matchups and so on.You have to figure out a way to beat the team your playing.Yea the playoffs are tougher but the best team doesnt win in the real playoffs either all the time...I play more roto than h2h but h2h is more real to me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont like cbs because its weekly.I like to have control of my players everyday.And ESPN is kind of klunky and I dont like their draft app.The player ratings seem off too.I dont see how you can say roto is more realistic.Teams dont add up at the end of the year who has the most points.They have to win more games than the other teams and adjust for slumps,pitching matchups and so on.You have to figure out a way to beat the team your playing.Yea the playoffs are tougher but the best team doesnt win in the real playoffs either all the time&#8230;I play more roto than h2h but h2h is more real to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilsonian</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215564</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilsonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[16 Team H2H Keeper where we keep 5. You can keep anyone forever if you want. I have the 13th pick in the first round. These are my keepers as of right now:

SS - Tulo
OF - Stanton
3B - Lawrie
SP - Lester
RP - Kimbrel

I could possibly swing Lester and my 1st or 2nd round pick for Moore and the 2nd overall pick. Would that be wise? Or should I shoot for me sending a worse pick? Or should I avoid it altogether?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16 Team H2H Keeper where we keep 5. You can keep anyone forever if you want. I have the 13th pick in the first round. These are my keepers as of right now:</p>
<p>SS &#8211; Tulo<br />
OF &#8211; Stanton<br />
3B &#8211; Lawrie<br />
SP &#8211; Lester<br />
RP &#8211; Kimbrel</p>
<p>I could possibly swing Lester and my 1st or 2nd round pick for Moore and the 2nd overall pick. Would that be wise? Or should I shoot for me sending a worse pick? Or should I avoid it altogether?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wake Up</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-reader-poll-results-2012/#comment-1215534</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=23022#comment-1215534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like we are in the majority.  I prefer AVG + OPS.  You still get OBP in there but the SLG really helps to negate the otherwise worthless SB-only guys.
We also add in QS which helps good starters on bad teams and makes guys like Capps and Fuentes less valuable, just as they should be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like we are in the majority.  I prefer AVG + OPS.  You still get OBP in there but the SLG really helps to negate the otherwise worthless SB-only guys.<br />
We also add in QS which helps good starters on bad teams and makes guys like Capps and Fuentes less valuable, just as they should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
