<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Razzball Poll &#8211; Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://razzball.com/razzball-poll-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-poll-part-ii/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=razzball-poll-part-ii</link>
	<description>Fantasy Baseball Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 10:34:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Gamble</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-poll-part-ii/#comment-1208381</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=22973#comment-1208381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Disco, Outs is identical to IP.  assuming there isn&#039;t an innings cap, this is okay i guess.  But you have to go 6 SPs in a league format like that given the extra counting stat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Disco, Outs is identical to IP.  assuming there isn&#8217;t an innings cap, this is okay i guess.  But you have to go 6 SPs in a league format like that given the extra counting stat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disco</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-poll-part-ii/#comment-1208352</link>
		<dc:creator>Disco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=22973#comment-1208352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my H2H leagues this year added OPS for hitters and Outs for pitchers to the standard 5x5 cats.  It&#039;s a weekly lineup league, starting 4 SP, 2 RP and 2 P, so outs and Ks can&#039;t be gamed from streaming except by starting 6 SP, and then you&#039;re probably at a disadvantage in Saves.  We wanted to add OPS but also had a hard time coming up with a sixth pitching category, didn&#039;t really want to do Holds, and Yahoo didn&#039;t have a Losses+Blown Saves category, so we went with Outs.  Also we figured since HR are both a R and a RBI it added some symmetry having a K also be an Out.  Any thoughts on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my H2H leagues this year added OPS for hitters and Outs for pitchers to the standard 5&#215;5 cats.  It&#8217;s a weekly lineup league, starting 4 SP, 2 RP and 2 P, so outs and Ks can&#8217;t be gamed from streaming except by starting 6 SP, and then you&#8217;re probably at a disadvantage in Saves.  We wanted to add OPS but also had a hard time coming up with a sixth pitching category, didn&#8217;t really want to do Holds, and Yahoo didn&#8217;t have a Losses+Blown Saves category, so we went with Outs.  Also we figured since HR are both a R and a RBI it added some symmetry having a K also be an Out.  Any thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-poll-part-ii/#comment-1208154</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=22973#comment-1208154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@3FingersBrown, Having only 5 pitching slots, having qs, and only 1/8 of the pitching stats being directly reliever oriented, comPletely removes relievers from our league equation and it&#039;s a travesty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@3FingersBrown, Having only 5 pitching slots, having qs, and only 1/8 of the pitching stats being directly reliever oriented, comPletely removes relievers from our league equation and it&#8217;s a travesty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-poll-part-ii/#comment-1208151</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=22973#comment-1208151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Skeptic, ...imply and are there different ways to get to the same value. Plus every league drafts differently so a tool that allows you to deal with that would be powerful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Skeptic, &#8230;imply and are there different ways to get to the same value. Plus every league drafts differently so a tool that allows you to deal with that would be powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-poll-part-ii/#comment-1208149</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=22973#comment-1208149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rudy Gamble, Thanks for the as always thoughtful reply. I&#039;ve made a ton of arguments for classic 5x5 but these are guys who like to over analyze stupid crap; your slg v tb point is the same one that I made. I ultimately have to go to &quot;whats actually the best proxy for real baseball.&quot; the diminution of relievers in the league infuriates me the most and we have only 5 pitching slots so you can&#039;t have mr if you want to make the innings max each week (and you&#039;re rolling out liriano to get his 3ip of 9era suckitude).


Anyway, I applaud the effort to accommodate a wider variety of playing styles.  I&#039;m trying to convince awesomeous Maximus to create a dynamic pitching tool to try something differen than greys tiers-- because liriano really burned me and I want to see if I can track greys quasi point share values ie how many $/pts total does greys pitching strat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rudy Gamble, Thanks for the as always thoughtful reply. I&#8217;ve made a ton of arguments for classic 5&#215;5 but these are guys who like to over analyze stupid crap; your slg v tb point is the same one that I made. I ultimately have to go to &#8220;whats actually the best proxy for real baseball.&#8221; the diminution of relievers in the league infuriates me the most and we have only 5 pitching slots so you can&#8217;t have mr if you want to make the innings max each week (and you&#8217;re rolling out liriano to get his 3ip of 9era suckitude).</p>
<p>Anyway, I applaud the effort to accommodate a wider variety of playing styles.  I&#8217;m trying to convince awesomeous Maximus to create a dynamic pitching tool to try something differen than greys tiers&#8211; because liriano really burned me and I want to see if I can track greys quasi point share values ie how many $/pts total does greys pitching strat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3FingersBrown</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-poll-part-ii/#comment-1208130</link>
		<dc:creator>3FingersBrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=22973#comment-1208130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dig OBP, SLG% or OPS over AVG. Screw singles hitters with no plate discipline... 

QS is a useful metric to give value to innings eaters who may have so-so K rates. Of course it puts an even greater emphasis on starters... I agree, holds are weak.

I play in both Roto and H2H. The statistics geek in me appreciates Roto but the degenerate gambler in me prefers H2H. So yeah, I&#039;d love to see more H2H content - Hitter match-ups against upcoming pitchers, splits, that sort of stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dig OBP, SLG% or OPS over AVG. Screw singles hitters with no plate discipline&#8230; </p>
<p>QS is a useful metric to give value to innings eaters who may have so-so K rates. Of course it puts an even greater emphasis on starters&#8230; I agree, holds are weak.</p>
<p>I play in both Roto and H2H. The statistics geek in me appreciates Roto but the degenerate gambler in me prefers H2H. So yeah, I&#8217;d love to see more H2H content &#8211; Hitter match-ups against upcoming pitchers, splits, that sort of stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Gamble</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-poll-part-ii/#comment-1207990</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=22973#comment-1207990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Skeptic, Grey and I are personally fans of classic 5x5.  I think any variant should maintain an equal # of categories for hitting and pitching.  And I really don&#039;t think any of the other pitcher metrics out there are worthwhile from a sabermetric point of view.  I can see the argument for Holds since Middle Relievers are so important in baseball but the best MRs have real value in 5x5 - no need to use a phony metric like Holds.

There are solid arguments why OBP is better than AVG and that AVG + HR undervalue DB and TR.  And that R/RBI are team-dependent.  If I was creating a sabermetric league, I would totally change the categories.  But I don&#039;t think that league would be more fun than 5x5 fantasy baseball so what&#039;s the point? :)  Re: your league&#039;s format, TB AND SLG?  Why both?  K&#039;s for hitters seems arbitrary.

This poll is definitely showing that a lot of people are taking advantage of Yahoo/ESPN/CBSSports&#039; flexibility in adding new categories.  So Grey and I will need to think about if/how we can address this better in our posts/projections.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Skeptic, Grey and I are personally fans of classic 5&#215;5.  I think any variant should maintain an equal # of categories for hitting and pitching.  And I really don&#8217;t think any of the other pitcher metrics out there are worthwhile from a sabermetric point of view.  I can see the argument for Holds since Middle Relievers are so important in baseball but the best MRs have real value in 5&#215;5 &#8211; no need to use a phony metric like Holds.</p>
<p>There are solid arguments why OBP is better than AVG and that AVG + HR undervalue DB and TR.  And that R/RBI are team-dependent.  If I was creating a sabermetric league, I would totally change the categories.  But I don&#8217;t think that league would be more fun than 5&#215;5 fantasy baseball so what&#8217;s the point? <img src='http://razzball.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Re: your league&#8217;s format, TB AND SLG?  Why both?  K&#8217;s for hitters seems arbitrary.</p>
<p>This poll is definitely showing that a lot of people are taking advantage of Yahoo/ESPN/CBSSports&#8217; flexibility in adding new categories.  So Grey and I will need to think about if/how we can address this better in our posts/projections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/razzball-poll-part-ii/#comment-1207886</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=22973#comment-1207886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For leagues that use greater numbers of categories, the more diminished the value of steals and save stats become. For example my primary league has TB/avg/sb/slg/obp/k/r/RBI and era/w/whip/so/s/k9/l/qs/kbb ratio.

Ps what are your thoughts on those cats? I don&#039;t much care for them personally but what are some arguments I can make against them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For leagues that use greater numbers of categories, the more diminished the value of steals and save stats become. For example my primary league has TB/avg/sb/slg/obp/k/r/RBI and era/w/whip/so/s/k9/l/qs/kbb ratio.</p>
<p>Ps what are your thoughts on those cats? I don&#8217;t much care for them personally but what are some arguments I can make against them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
