Comments on: Nats Finally Sign a One-Tool Outfielder http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/ Fantasy Baseball Advice Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:11:03 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: hess505 http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/comment-page-1/#comment-22896 hess505 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:00:31 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=3984#comment-22896 Dunn will be a huge asset to the Nationals but I do believe his fantasy value does indeed go down with this trade because until players like Elijah Dukes and Lastings Milledge stop swinging at everything, which be fixed overnight, Dunn will be hardly anybody to drive in or for anybody to drive him in... Dunn will be a huge asset to the Nationals but I do believe his fantasy value does indeed go down with this trade because until players like Elijah Dukes and Lastings Milledge stop swinging at everything, which be fixed overnight, Dunn will be hardly anybody to drive in or for anybody to drive him in…

]]> By: Freak http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/comment-page-1/#comment-22851 Freak Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:49:10 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=3984#comment-22851 I hear that the Nats are shopping Johnson so Dunn will be at first. I hear that the Nats are shopping Johnson so Dunn will be at first.

]]> By: Rudy Gamble http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/comment-page-1/#comment-22823 Rudy Gamble Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:04:45 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=3984#comment-22823 @<a href="#comment-22802" rel="nofollow">IowaCubs</a>: At those rates, I'll take Dukes as my 5th OF over Milledge as my 3rd OF... @IowaCubs: At those rates, I’ll take Dukes as my 5th OF over Milledge as my 3rd OF…

]]> By: Grey http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/comment-page-1/#comment-22819 Grey Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:49:11 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=3984#comment-22819 @<a href="#comment-22818" rel="nofollow">Yak</a>: Not crazy about that trade. @Yak: Not crazy about that trade.

]]> By: Yak http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/comment-page-1/#comment-22818 Yak Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:45:43 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=3984#comment-22818 Should I trade B. Phillips for Dye and Lind? i would have to drop either Snell or Pierre. It's 5 OF and I currently have Rios, Crawford, Cust, Milledge, and Pierre starting at OF. I have Phillips at MI but can plug in Pherhaltah. Thanks Should I trade B. Phillips for Dye and Lind? i would have to drop either Snell or Pierre. It’s 5 OF and I currently have Rios, Crawford, Cust, Milledge, and Pierre starting at OF. I have Phillips at MI but can plug in Pherhaltah. Thanks

]]> By: Grey http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/comment-page-1/#comment-22814 Grey Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:47:48 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=3984#comment-22814 @<a href="#comment-22813" rel="nofollow">cruisinkc</a>: I'd go Shields, Beckett, Gonzo then Bills, in that order. Beckett and Gonzo are very close, but I want Shields more than either. @cruisinkc: I’d go Shields, Beckett, Gonzo then Bills, in that order. Beckett and Gonzo are very close, but I want Shields more than either.

]]> By: cruisinkc http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/comment-page-1/#comment-22813 cruisinkc Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:42:09 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=3984#comment-22813 @<a href="#comment-22812" rel="nofollow">Grey</a>: quality starts @Grey: quality starts

]]> By: Grey http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/comment-page-1/#comment-22812 Grey Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:38:53 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=3984#comment-22812 @<a href="#comment-22805" rel="nofollow">cruisinkc</a>: Hmm... That is tough. Before I answer, can you tell me what the 6th category is for pitching? @cruisinkc: Hmm… That is tough. Before I answer, can you tell me what the 6th category is for pitching?

]]> By: cruisinkc http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/comment-page-1/#comment-22805 cruisinkc Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:53:29 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=3984#comment-22805 This is references back to an earlier question I had regarding keepers. Reminder my league is 10 teams and each team keeps 6. The league is roto 6X6 but there has been a recent change in an offensive category. We use to have doubles but now have replaced it with OPS. OPS heavily favors sluggers, which brings me to my question... Should I consider keeping adrian gonzalez now and stick him in my Utility spot or still keep one of my pitchers as my last keeper? My keepers so far: Tex, Rollins, Braun, Rollins, Markakis Last keeper possibilities: Gonzo, Billingsley, Beckett, James Shields This is references back to an earlier question I had regarding keepers.
Reminder my league is 10 teams and each team keeps 6. The league is roto 6X6 but there has been a recent change in an offensive category. We use to have doubles but now have replaced it with OPS. OPS heavily favors sluggers, which brings me to my question…
Should I consider keeping adrian gonzalez now and stick him in my Utility spot or still keep one of my pitchers as my last keeper?

My keepers so far: Tex, Rollins, Braun, Rollins, Markakis

Last keeper possibilities: Gonzo, Billingsley, Beckett, James Shields

]]> By: Tony http://razzball.com/nats-finally-sign-a-one-tool-outfielder/comment-page-1/#comment-22804 Tony Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:52:03 +0000 http://razzball.com/?p=3984#comment-22804 gotta love some big country.... and does he want to win or make lotsa money? This contract just makes that decision. gotta love some big country…. and does he want to win or make lotsa money? This contract just makes that decision.

]]>