Argument for and against using LF,RF, and CF over 3-5 OF

News, Injuries, Rosters - All baseball all the time!
User avatar
TheBigSalad
Posts: 235
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:27 pm

Argument for and against using LF,RF, and CF over 3-5 OF

Postby TheBigSalad » Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:38 am

Why do you prefer 3-5 OF at any outfield position instead of requiring outfielder specific positions? Vice versa?

User avatar
Mauddib
Posts: 2176
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:10 am

Re: Argument for and against using LF,RF, and CF over 3-5 OF

Postby Mauddib » Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:01 am

Personally because it is easier. I just want to draft OF and not have to worry about position. Not sure it is a good reason but it is what I am going with.

ensanimal
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 6:31 pm

Re: Argument for and against using LF,RF, and CF over 3-5 OF

Postby ensanimal » Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:25 am

I prefer having more OF spots than going with specific positions. 5 OF is better than using LF/CF/RF only for me. If it's a shallow league, I could see trying the three spots to try and add an extra element.

User avatar
Wallpaper Paterson
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 9:17 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Argument for and against using LF,RF, and CF over 3-5 OF

Postby Wallpaper Paterson » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:55 pm

I have never played in a 4 or 5 outfielder league.

I do like LF-CF-RF

pythons007
Posts: 326
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 8:32 am

Re: Argument for and against using LF,RF, and CF over 3-5 OF

Postby pythons007 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:42 am

If you play in a league where they use LF/CF/RF, you might have to pass on a better player or a player you're more interested in to fill a need. Not always something I like to do, but I do play in a league like that. However, we have 2 additinal OF spots.

User avatar
Jordan73
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:59 am

Re: Argument for and against using LF,RF, and CF over 3-5 OF

Postby Jordan73 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:50 am

We swapped to the LF, CF, RF format last year, and there were no complaints. We also had one OF slot as well as Util, so you could play up to 5 outfielders if you chose. Using the individual positions just requires a bit more strategic thinking, especially at the draft table. Going into last year's auction draft, LF was kinda shallow, but since I had Braun as a keeper, I was able to start a few bidding wars for the few remaining top tier LFs. Good times.

User avatar
Sky
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:42 am

Re: Argument for and against using LF,RF, and CF over 3-5 OF

Postby Sky » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:57 pm

My deep keeper league has LF/CF/RF and plus two more open OF spots. It creates interesting draft strategies. You no longer target based on just OF but by the positions themselves. Can add an element of challenge in deeper settings, maybe doesn't have a huge effect on a standard league setting.
Sky Sperling is a contributor for Razzball Football and Razzball Baseball. He’s also a lover of fine beer, fine women and fine-toothed combs. You can follow him on twitter @Sky_Razzball and in your most sweetest of dreams.


Return to “Baseball - General Player Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests