It is currently Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:49 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Berkman trade
PostPosted: Thu May 02, 2013 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 9:17 pm
Posts: 291
Location: New Jersey
Berkman and Cingrani

For

Bumgarner and Molina


Fair trade or ridiculous?


Keeper league


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Berkman trade
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 4:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:10 am
Posts: 2176
Love the deal for whoever is getting Bumgarner. I think that side wins pretty easily but I could see why someone would want the Cingrani side. I just don't think Cingrani can keep this up all year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Berkman trade
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 7:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 9:17 pm
Posts: 291
Location: New Jersey
Now what if I told you the guy receiving Berkman and Cingrani just joined the league yesterday and is taking over a 7-37-4 team?

Now what if I told you the commissioner hand picked this replacement manager and the commissioner is the one receiving Bumgarner and Y. Molina?

Looks worse now, right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Berkman trade
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:10 am
Posts: 2176
A little dubious. But like i said, I could see why someone might take the Cingrani side. I would have to see more questionable stuff than one trade before I started raising the pitch forks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Berkman trade
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 2:59 pm 
Offline
Sponsor
Sponsor

Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am
Posts: 207
I call shenanigans. Bumgarner > Cingrani, and Molina > Berkman. It's not even close, and it's not like Bumgarner is an aging veteran. He's actually a month younger than Cingrani.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Berkman trade
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 9:17 pm
Posts: 291
Location: New Jersey
Mauddib wrote:
A little dubious. But like i said, I could see why someone might take the Cingrani side. I would have to see more questionable stuff than one trade before I started raising the pitch forks.

Thanks for the reply.

There have been other odd things in this league but I won't bore you with that.

The entry fee due date was extended to May 15 (only now there is a $10 past deadline fee at League Safe) due to some of the league problems. I have between now and then to decide if I believe the league might right itself and that things are good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Berkman trade
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2013 4:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:13 pm
Posts: 88
GTFO that league yo..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Berkman trade
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2013 5:00 am 
Offline
Sponsor
Sponsor

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:17 am
Posts: 382
Location: New York NY
I don't think it's that bad. Some people just make bad trades. It has to be allowed. He is the new owner of a crap team in a keeper league. If he feels cingrani is the player with the brightest future in that trade he has a right to overpay to get him.

This isn't such a bad deal that you should consider vetoing it. It sould more like one of those times when a trade goes through and we as owners get annoyed because we would have offered more for a guy than was accepted. That's not a reason for a veto.

As for collusion it's always easier to make a trade with a guy you know and can talk to on a phone instead of just with back and forth email offers, the fact that this new guy knows the commish means they have advantages as trading partners in their ability to negotiate but again it doesn't mean they are cheating.

_________________
16 team mixed league redraft league

SLG and OBP + runs, hr, Rbi, sb,

Wins, SV, K, ERA, WHIP, QS.

We use RF, LF, CF instead of just OF also.

Hitting:

C: Carlos Santana
1B: Jose Abreu
2B: Kolton Wong
SS: Ben Zobrist
3B: Manny Machado
MI: Neil Walker
CI: Kennys Vargas
RF: Michael Saunders
CF: Lorenzo Cain
LF: Starling Marte
OF: Kris Davis
Util: Anthony Gose
Bench: Denard Span
Bench: Andrelton Simmons

Pitching:
SP: Jeff Samardzija
SP: Gerrit Cole
SP: Tyson Ross
RP: Zach Britton
RP: Steve Chishek
P: Garrett Richards
P: Brandon McCarthy
P: Taijuan Walker
BN: Jason Hammel
BN: James Nelson
BN: Brett Anderson

DL: Beachy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Berkman trade
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2013 7:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 9:17 pm
Posts: 291
Location: New Jersey
Well, it went through. There was no way it was going to be vetoed. I checked the settings on trade vetoes (it is an issue I normally do not care about as I very rarely ever vote against a trade) and saw that the commish set it up for 7 votes to get a trade vetoed. Getting seven of eight people to vote against a trade in a 24-hour period is next to impossible no matter how egregious the trade may appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Berkman trade
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2013 7:36 am 
Offline
Sponsor
Sponsor

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:17 am
Posts: 382
Location: New York NY
7 of 8..., that's crazy.

I'm not a veto fan, but I mean your league basically doesn't have a veto if you need 7 of 8 votes. You could do Harper for Bonifacio by those rules and it would go through.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: