Comments on: Brian Matusz, 2010 Fantasy Outlook

By: Grey

Grey — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:02:50 +0000

@bill: Stewart because of position eligibility; Davis without it.

By: bill

bill — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:58:57 +0000

Not considering position eligibility, who do you like more, Chris Davis or Ian Stewart?

By: Grey

Grey — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:41:19 +0000

*******THERE’S A NEW POST TALKING ABOUT GRANDY AND JACKSON.****

By: Tony

Tony — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:33:05 +0000

@Grey: rototimes says its basically a done deal as long as physicals go thru… Such a joke, the yankees get a big time OF’er for ian kennedy and …. some prospects.

JOKE, makes me sick. The rich get richer.

By: Grey

Grey — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:00:22 +0000

@black love: I think Damon's gone if it is indeed through.

By: black love

black love — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:58:17 +0000

that granderson deal i think is all about locked up. you think the yanks will try to move damon now?

By: Grey

Grey — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:56:26 +0000

@T-BZA: Wow, that would be huge. Will have to do a post about that.

By: T-BZA

T-BZA — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:50:15 +0000

Good looks on the quick response! Max Scherzer to the A.L and Jackson to the N.L has interesting fantasy implications too:

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/yanks-tigers-dbacks-discussed-blockbuster.html

By: Grey

Grey — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:46:19 +0000

@T-BZA: He would.

By: T-BZA

T-BZA — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:41:34 +0000

Does Granderson become a keeper (i.e. top 70 pick) in a deep 12-team league with a trade to the short-porch in the Bronx?