<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Fantasy Baseball Projections (CHONE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/</link>
	<description>Fantasy Baseball Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:38:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Gamble</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/comment-page-1/#comment-28023</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=2936#comment-28023</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-28022&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Steve J.&lt;/a&gt;: The last two updates I did for 10 team and 12 team - which combine Marcel, CHONE, and ZiPS projections and adjust for playing time and injuries - went up on March 7th.  See here (http://razzball.com/2009-razzball-point-shares/).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-28022" rel="nofollow">Steve J.</a>: The last two updates I did for 10 team and 12 team &#8211; which combine Marcel, CHONE, and ZiPS projections and adjust for playing time and injuries &#8211; went up on March 7th.  See here (<a href="http://razzball.com/2009-razzball-point-shares/)." rel="nofollow">http://razzball.com/2009-razzball-point-shares/).</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve J.</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/comment-page-1/#comment-28022</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=2936#comment-28022</guid>
		<description>are these going to be updated again to account for injuries (like arod)?

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are these going to be updated again to account for injuries (like arod)?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/comment-page-1/#comment-21253</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=2936#comment-21253</guid>
		<description>ok got it, excellent info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok got it, excellent info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/comment-page-1/#comment-21251</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=2936#comment-21251</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, meant to ask if it was available in excel spreadsheet format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, meant to ask if it was available in excel spreadsheet format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grey</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/comment-page-1/#comment-21250</link>
		<dc:creator>Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=2936#comment-21250</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-21249&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ben&lt;/a&gt;: If you scroll over 2009 Fantasy Baseball Rankings at the top of the site, you&#039;ll see them.  Either way, it&#039;s here (http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-rankings/2009-razzball-projected-point-shares-12-team-marcel/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-21249" rel="nofollow">Ben</a>: If you scroll over 2009 Fantasy Baseball Rankings at the top of the site, you&#8217;ll see them.  Either way, it&#8217;s here (<a href="http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-rankings/2009-razzball-projected-point-shares-12-team-marcel/)" rel="nofollow">http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-rankings/2009-razzball-projected-point-shares-12-team-marcel/)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/comment-page-1/#comment-21249</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=2936#comment-21249</guid>
		<description>Is there a link for the 2009 Projected Point Shares for 12 team based on Marcel?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a link for the 2009 Projected Point Shares for 12 team based on Marcel?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Gamble</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/comment-page-1/#comment-21225</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=2936#comment-21225</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-21214&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;zagi-CRO&lt;/a&gt;:  We just focus on fantasy baseball here so we wouldn&#039;t convert the data into expected winning %s for real teams.  I don&#039;t think Marcel, CHONE, or ZiPs does this but they might.  Baseball Prospectus does this I believe - if they didn&#039;t do it explicitly, you can just take hitting Runs, subtract Runs (given up) and then divide by 10 to determine the # of wins above/below 81 (I believe this is called the Pythagorean win projection).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-21214" rel="nofollow">zagi-CRO</a>:  We just focus on fantasy baseball here so we wouldn&#8217;t convert the data into expected winning %s for real teams.  I don&#8217;t think Marcel, CHONE, or ZiPs does this but they might.  Baseball Prospectus does this I believe &#8211; if they didn&#8217;t do it explicitly, you can just take hitting Runs, subtract Runs (given up) and then divide by 10 to determine the # of wins above/below 81 (I believe this is called the Pythagorean win projection).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zagi-CRO</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/comment-page-1/#comment-21214</link>
		<dc:creator>zagi-CRO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=2936#comment-21214</guid>
		<description>Please, do you have projection of the final record for all teams based on your methodology?

Regards, Zagi-CRO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, do you have projection of the final record for all teams based on your methodology?</p>
<p>Regards, Zagi-CRO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/comment-page-1/#comment-21079</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=2936#comment-21079</guid>
		<description>I like with where you&#039;re going with this.  However, the first thing I would say is to eliminate hits/9 from your stats.  The thinking is that hits allowed are in part a function of team defense, rather than pitcher skill.  I like the idea of using the rate stat projections to come up with a projected FIP or QERA or something like that.  If you want more of an explanation of this stuff, email me privately at nickojohnson at yahoo and I can give you some additional resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like with where you&#8217;re going with this.  However, the first thing I would say is to eliminate hits/9 from your stats.  The thinking is that hits allowed are in part a function of team defense, rather than pitcher skill.  I like the idea of using the rate stat projections to come up with a projected FIP or QERA or something like that.  If you want more of an explanation of this stuff, email me privately at nickojohnson at yahoo and I can give you some additional resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dungeness Dragons</title>
		<link>http://razzball.com/2009-fantasy-baseball-projections-chone/comment-page-1/#comment-21077</link>
		<dc:creator>Dungeness Dragons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razzball.com/?p=2936#comment-21077</guid>
		<description>This is a really interesting discussion and I hope you don&#039;t mind me jumping in.
This year, I am relying heavily on CHONE for my pitching projections.  It&#039;s my belief that ERA and (to a lesser degree) WHIP are both so noisy that they should not be projected directly.  Instead, I&#039;m constructing another composite measure based on projected K/BB, K/9, HR/9, and hits/9.  
I&#039;m pulling Saves from Marcel.  I&#039;m very interested in the Reliability measure but I&#039;m having trouble figuring out how to use it.  Treating it as a discount factor doesn&#039;t seem right since it seems to include both positive and negative risk.  Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really interesting discussion and I hope you don&#8217;t mind me jumping in.<br />
This year, I am relying heavily on CHONE for my pitching projections.  It&#8217;s my belief that ERA and (to a lesser degree) WHIP are both so noisy that they should not be projected directly.  Instead, I&#8217;m constructing another composite measure based on projected K/BB, K/9, HR/9, and hits/9.<br />
I&#8217;m pulling Saves from Marcel.  I&#8217;m very interested in the Reliability measure but I&#8217;m having trouble figuring out how to use it.  Treating it as a discount factor doesn&#8217;t seem right since it seems to include both positive and negative risk.  Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
